person looking at his clock in the cafe waiting for his friend

Do you value others’ time as much as your own?

March 24, 2018
  • Yes
  • No, my time matters more

In a world that races against the ticking hands of time, the question of how we value our own time relative to others’ often surfaces in both personal introspections and public discourses. It’s a query that invites us to explore the depth of our empathy, our societal obligations, and our individual aspirations. How we answer the question, “Do you value others’ time as much as your own?” reveals not just our personal philosophy but also echoes the broader cultural and ethical landscapes in which we operate.

person late for a meeting

Understanding the Affirmative: Yes, I Value Others’ Time as Much as My Own

Choosing ‘Yes’ to this question often stems from a principle of reciprocity and empathy. It is a testament to the golden rule many of us were taught as children: treat others as you would like to be treated. This view holds that respecting another person’s time is not just a courtesy but a fundamental aspect of human dignity and equality.

Philosophically, this stance aligns closely with the works of Immanuel Kant, who advocated for treating others as ends in themselves and never merely as means to one’s own ends. When we value others’ time as our own, we acknowledge their right to pursue life’s goals with the same fervor and dedication as we do ours.

time and money abstraction

In practical terms, this might manifest in everyday actions like being punctual for meetings, responding promptly to communications, or ensuring that our commitments to others are met with the same seriousness as our personal deadlines. It’s a behavioral standard that fosters trust and builds robust relationships, whether in professional settings or personal interactions.

Statistics also reinforce the importance of mutual respect for time. A survey showed that companies which foster a culture of respect for all employees’ time see a significant improvement in job satisfaction and a decrease in turnover rates. In the social realm, relationships where time is mutually valued tend to be stronger and more enduring.

Exploring the Dissent: No, My Time Matters More

On the flip side, opting for ‘No’ can be rooted in a pragmatic acknowledgment of one’s own goals, responsibilities, and limitations. This choice does not necessarily denote a lack of empathy or respect but might be driven by an acute awareness of personal or professional priorities that demand an asymmetric investment of time.

For some, time is a resource that, once spent, is irrevocable. From this perspective, prioritizing one’s own time could be seen as an essential strategy for achieving significant personal or professional milestones. This is particularly resonant in highly competitive fields where personal advancement often requires singular focus and dedication.

Moreover, cultural narratives that glorify self-reliance and personal achievement, such as the American Dream, can influence this viewpoint. In such contexts, prioritizing one’s time might not only be seen as logical but necessary. It is about setting boundaries that ensure personal progress and wellbeing.

Indeed, some argue that by prioritizing their time, they can achieve greater successes, which in turn enables them to better support others. A tech entrepreneur might justify long work hours by focusing on the eventual benefits their innovations could provide to society.

Integrating Perspectives Through Popular Culture

The tension between these perspectives is often explored in popular culture. For instance, in the movie “Click,” the protagonist finds a magical remote that allows him to fast forward through moments he deems mundane or difficult. Initially, he sees this as a way to prioritize his time effectively, only to realize that he’s missing out on precious life experiences with his loved ones. This film poignantly illustrates the potential consequences of valuing one’s time at the expense of others.

Similarly, Robert Frost’s poem “The Road Not Taken” subtly touches upon the choice of how we allocate our time and the profound impact of these decisions on our life’s journey. Each path represents a different allocation of time and attention, with the understanding that each choice precludes another.

The Impact of Our Choices

How we answer the question about valuing time also has tangible effects on societal dynamics. For instance, when individuals consistently prioritize their own time over others’, it can lead to a societal norm where mutual respect and cooperation may diminish, potentially increasing conflict and misunderstanding.

Conversely, a collective commitment to valuing each other’s time can lead to a more harmonious and efficient society. It encourages a culture of punctuality, respect, and consideration, which are crucial for collaborative success in both community and business environments.


The question of whether you value others’ time as much as your own is profound and complex. It invites a reflection on personal ethics, societal norms, and the balance between individual ambition and collective welfare. While some may see their time as a critical resource that they must guard zealously, others view time as a shared commodity, where the equitable distribution fosters mutual respect and societal harmony.

In choosing how to answer this poll, consider not only the immediate impact of your choice but also the broader implications it may have on your interactions and the fabric of society. Whether through philosophical reflection, cultural insights

  • Share opinions on topics that matter to you.
  • Learn what others think through comprehensive, real time stats.
  • Your vote is anonymous.
Sign Up. It's free!
Register to vote and to view all content
  • in use
  • taken
    We assume that you want to comment anonymously so we recommend not using your real name for the username.
    • Must be 6 - 20 characters.
    • Allowed characters: a-z, A-Z, 0-9, underscores, periods and hyphens.
    • Must start with a letter.
  • Password must meet the following requirements:
    • Be at least 8 characters
    • At least one number
    • At least one uppercase letter
    • At least one lowercase letter
  • I agree to Terms of Use and I have read Privacy Policy.
Sign Up

More in Moral Standards
trolley problem
In the classic “trolley problem,” if you were faced with a decision to pull a lever, which choice would you make?
October 21, 2023
  • Pull the lever to divert the trolley, sacrificing one person to save five.
  • Do not pull the lever, allowing the trolley to continue its course, resulting in the death of five people but sparing the one.
  • Unsure/Prefer not to answer.
The “trolley problem” has been a captivating ethical conundrum for decades, making its mark on philosophical discourse and, more recently, permeating pop culture, from movies…