Multi sports proud players collage on grand arena

Would you rather be the worst player on a championship team, or the best player on an average team?

March 23, 2018
  • Worst player on a championship team
  • Best player on an average team

In the realm of team sports, a unique and thought-provoking question often arises: would you rather be the worst player on a championship team or the best player on an average team? This query probes the depths of personal ambition and team allegiance, uncovering various aspects of what individuals value most in their sports careers.

The Case for Being the Worst Player on a Championship Team

soccer player sitting on the bench for substitution

For many, the allure of being part of a championship team holds a charm that transcends personal glory. Being the worst player on a team that achieves the highest accolades can offer a unique set of rewards and experiences that go beyond the stat sheet. Firstly, there’s the undeniable joy of being part of a winning team. Championships are rare, and the opportunity to participate in triumphant moments can be a once-in-a-lifetime experience that many would not want to miss.

Moreover, players on championship teams often benefit from a high level of exposure and recognition. They have the chance to learn from the best, both teammates and coaches, which can significantly enhance their skills and understanding of the game. “You’re only as good as the team you’re with,” a seasoned coach once remarked, highlighting the growth opportunities that come from being surrounded by excellence.

Additionally, championship teams often foster a deep sense of camaraderie and collective success. The experience can instill a profound appreciation for teamwork and the understanding that individual success is deeply intertwined with the group’s efforts. This can be invaluable for personal development, both on and off the field.

The Case for Being the Best Player on an Average Team

dramatic sports image showing a skilled, determined player in action

On the flip side, being the best player on an average team presents a different set of advantages and personal satisfactions. For starters, it allows an individual to shine and stand out, often becoming the centerpiece of the team’s strategy and identity. This role can be incredibly gratifying for those who thrive under the spotlight and wish to test the limits of their capabilities.

Leadership is another significant aspect of being the team’s standout player. It provides an opportunity to lead by example and help elevate the team’s overall performance, potentially turning an average team into a formidable contender. As philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche once mused, “He who would learn to fly one day must first learn to stand and walk and run and climb and dance; one cannot fly into flying.” This metaphor beautifully illustrates the developmental trajectory of a leader in sports.

Furthermore, being the best player on an average team often means more opportunities to directly influence the outcome of games. This can be incredibly satisfying for competitive individuals who relish the challenge of making pivotal plays that decide the fate of their team.

Statistical Insights and Trends

Interestingly, a survey showed that athletes who have experienced both roles often find their tenure as the best player on an average team more personally fulfilling, citing greater opportunities for personal challenge and growth. Conversely, those who prioritize collective achievements view their time on championship teams as the pinnacle of their careers, emphasizing the unforgettable nature of winning titles.

Philosophical and Cultural Reflections

football player

The decision between these two roles can also reflect broader philosophical and cultural values. In a society that often glorifies individual achievement, the choice to be a standout player on an average team resonates with the American dream of personal success and recognition. In contrast, the communal values seen in team sports echo a different set of cultural norms that emphasize collective achievement and shared success.


Ultimately, the choice between being the worst player on a championship team or the best player on an average team depends on personal values, career goals, and the kind of legacy one wishes to leave in the world of sports. While each path offers unique rewards and challenges, they both provide valuable experiences that shape an athlete’s career and character. As we look at the journeys of famous athletes who have walked both paths, it becomes clear that the true victory lies in the pursuit of passion, whether it shines through in personal glory or shared triumphs.

  • Share opinions on topics that matter to you.
  • Learn what others think through comprehensive, real time stats.
  • Your vote is anonymous.
Sign Up. It's free!
Register to vote and to view all content
  • in use
  • taken
    We assume that you want to comment anonymously so we recommend not using your real name for the username.
    • Must be 6 - 20 characters.
    • Allowed characters: a-z, A-Z, 0-9, underscores, periods and hyphens.
    • Must start with a letter.
  • Password must meet the following requirements:
    • Be at least 8 characters
    • At least one number
    • At least one uppercase letter
    • At least one lowercase letter
  • I agree to Terms of Use and I have read Privacy Policy.
Sign Up

More in Choice
Choice between work and family
If you had to choose between a loving family or a highly successful job, which choice would you make?
March 28, 2018
  • I’d choose a loving family
  • I’d take the highly successful job!
Finding the right balance between family and career has always been a prominent problem in American society. The elusive ideal of “having it all” often…
Would you rather run a marathon (26.2 miles) or swim five miles?
March 24, 2018
  • 1. Run a marathon
  • 2. Swim five miles
The two sports couldn’t be more different, yet they both require the same amount of dedication and hard work. So, which one is better? In…